Partitioned Tables in Google BigQuery Reviews

Daniel R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Sukanya R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Helmut M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Pretty ok

Piotr D. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Armando D. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Jagadeesh P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Anton M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Dawid P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Veera R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Jakub A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Óliver P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Aleena M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Rajesh P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Gabby D. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

nice one

Manmohan J. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

All the correct answers to the multiple choice tests were incorrect. Indeed, the answer to the question "why the compute engine of BigQuery keeps processing all the records? " can not be "that despite of the existing date partitions it has to process all the records" precisely because there are no partitions at this point of the lab. Same, after partitioning the answer to the question "why the compute engine processed 0Byte ?" is because of the non-existance of partition among all the partitions of the given partioned table we created earlier which wasn't the expected answer to the multiple choices test.

Marcel S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

賢太朗北井 賢. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

ok

Leydi J. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Daniel F. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Diogo da Silva B. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Rajeev S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Carla F. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Tomy C. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Carlos G. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Eugene K. · Reviewed over 4 years ago