关于“Partitioned Tables in Google BigQuery”的评价

Andrés F. · 评论over 2 years之前

Partitioning rocks

Ashish S. · 评论over 2 years之前

Zhaohan D. · 评论over 2 years之前

vetrivel r. · 评论over 2 years之前

Marios C. · 评论over 2 years之前

Chung D. · 评论over 2 years之前

Matea M. · 评论over 2 years之前

Olesya S. · 评论over 2 years之前

Yuma T. · 评论over 2 years之前

Yuma T. · 评论over 2 years之前

Ravindra N. · 评论over 2 years之前

Josep Maria D. · 评论over 2 years之前

Steffen F. · 评论over 2 years之前

Azmi C. Ö. · 评论over 2 years之前

Anvesh P. · 评论over 2 years之前

Theppatorn R. · 评论over 2 years之前

Francisco Javier R. · 评论over 2 years之前

Chandra A. · 评论over 2 years之前

prabhu kumar m. · 评论over 2 years之前

Nirmal P. · 评论over 2 years之前

Michal Z. · 评论over 2 years之前

Alberto G. · 评论over 2 years之前

Akarsh K. · 评论over 2 years之前

The lab contents were good, but since it is tied to the current date, as a result some of the queries about expiration of partitions do not work straight out of the box. For example, the queries in tasks 5 & 6 do not return any data against "WAKAYAMA" anymore, but they do for other locations like "NAPOLI/CAPODICHINO". There is a note at the very end that "Your results will vary if you re-run the query in the future", but it doesn't seem explicit enough.

Cristina Yenyxe G. · 评论over 2 years之前

Prajwal B. · 评论over 2 years之前