关于“Partitioned Tables in Google BigQuery”的评价

Andrés F. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Partitioning rocks

Ashish S. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Zhaohan D. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

vetrivel r. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Marios C. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Chung D. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Matea M. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Olesya S. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Yuma T. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Yuma T. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Ravindra N. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Josep Maria D. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Steffen F. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Azmi C. Ö. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Anvesh P. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Theppatorn R. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Francisco Javier R. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Chandra A. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

prabhu kumar m. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Nirmal P. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Michal Z. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Alberto G. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Akarsh K. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

The lab contents were good, but since it is tied to the current date, as a result some of the queries about expiration of partitions do not work straight out of the box. For example, the queries in tasks 5 & 6 do not return any data against "WAKAYAMA" anymore, but they do for other locations like "NAPOLI/CAPODICHINO". There is a note at the very end that "Your results will vary if you re-run the query in the future", but it doesn't seem explicit enough.

Cristina Yenyxe G. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Prajwal B. · 已于 over 2 years前审核