Tabelas particionadas no Google BigQuery avaliações

Andrés F. · Revisado há over 2 years

Partitioning rocks

Ashish S. · Revisado há over 2 years

Zhaohan D. · Revisado há over 2 years

vetrivel r. · Revisado há over 2 years

Marios C. · Revisado há over 2 years

Chung D. · Revisado há over 2 years

Matea M. · Revisado há over 2 years

Olesya S. · Revisado há over 2 years

Yuma T. · Revisado há over 2 years

Yuma T. · Revisado há over 2 years

Ravindra N. · Revisado há over 2 years

Josep Maria D. · Revisado há over 2 years

Steffen F. · Revisado há over 2 years

Azmi C. Ö. · Revisado há over 2 years

Anvesh P. · Revisado há over 2 years

Theppatorn R. · Revisado há over 2 years

Francisco Javier R. · Revisado há over 2 years

Chandra A. · Revisado há over 2 years

prabhu kumar m. · Revisado há over 2 years

Nirmal P. · Revisado há over 2 years

Michal Z. · Revisado há over 2 years

Alberto G. · Revisado há over 2 years

Akarsh K. · Revisado há over 2 years

The lab contents were good, but since it is tied to the current date, as a result some of the queries about expiration of partitions do not work straight out of the box. For example, the queries in tasks 5 & 6 do not return any data against "WAKAYAMA" anymore, but they do for other locations like "NAPOLI/CAPODICHINO". There is a note at the very end that "Your results will vary if you re-run the query in the future", but it doesn't seem explicit enough.

Cristina Yenyxe G. · Revisado há over 2 years

Prajwal B. · Revisado há over 2 years