Autentikasi Pengguna: Identity-Aware Proxy Ulasan
234419 ulasan
Saimohan B. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
2511CS020271- G. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
2511CS020271- G. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
Hemanth S. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
Hemanth S. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
SIMRAN C. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
Devara S. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
2511CS010178- N. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
SAMYAK J. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
Alvarez Casillas B. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
RISHITHA A. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
DEVERASETTY V. · Diulas 28 hari lalu
too hard
Johnson K. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Sachi .. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Xara Elyse M. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Braz M. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Rodríguez Meléndez T. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
He tenido problemas con el Lab. al momento del paso de Identity-Aware Poxy lanza un error Failed to load IAP resources.
Victor Hugo B. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Marceli P. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Murat Y. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Hello Qwiklabs Support Team, I’m having an issue completing the checkpoint “Enable and add policy to IAP” in the lab “User Authentication: Identity-Aware Proxy (GSP499)”. The lab checker keeps returning: > “Please grant IAP-Secured Web App User role.” However, the environment is already configured correctly: * IAP is enabled for the App Engine app (the application URL returns HTTP 302 redirect to Google sign-in and includes the header `x-goog-iap-generated-response: true`, which indicates IAP is intercepting traffic). * The IAM binding is present for my lab user with the role `roles/iap.httpsResourceAccessor` (IAP-Secured Web App User): * Applied at the IAP App Engine resource level (App Engine default service). * Also applied at the project level, to be safe. Despite this, the checkpoint still fails repeatedly, which suggests a possible issue with the lab validation logic (or a delay/caching issue on the checker side). Lab details: * Lab: User Authentication: Identity-Aware Proxy (GSP499) * Project ID: qwiklabs-gcp-01-7162f85331cd * User: [student-00-1017588f33f7@qwiklabs.net](mailto:student-00-1017588f33f7@qwiklabs.net) Could you please verify the checker for this step, or advise if there is any additional hidden requirement the validator expects (beyond IAP enabled + `roles/iap.httpsResourceAccessor` binding)? I can provide screenshots/command outputs (HTTP 302 with IAP headers + IAM policy bindings) if needed. Thank you, Francisco Wendel de Lima Maciel
Francisco Wendel de L. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Erro recorrente
Francisco Wendel de L. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
.
Raj L. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Teutle Amastal G. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Danylo C. · Diulas 29 hari lalu
Kami tidak dapat memastikan bahwa ulasan yang dipublikasikan berasal dari konsumen yang telah membeli atau menggunakan produk terkait. Ulasan tidak diverifikasi oleh Google.