Develop an app with Gemini Reviews

AKSHYA K. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Kiruthika B. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Narumedsr P. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Vaibhavi D. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Sithu K. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Swarali C. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Supatra D. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Ye Min P. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Nagula H. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Sithu K. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

thummanun h. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Manoj K. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Manoj K. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

dipti c. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

it brings me to a new world

Boris C. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Wongsakorn K. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

excelente para ir prabando los serivicios

Ho Chi Minh T. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Steve C. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Stephanie S. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Fernando Tavella G. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

danilo m. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Emmanuel Alejandro C. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Marco Antonio R. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

Wellington A. · Reviewed 27 gün ago

The AI did not follow allong with the lab, and produce expected results. It wanted to fix the template code and kept bugging me to fix the templates before moving on to the next steps. If I ignore something the AI thinks is a good thing to do, it shouldn't keep bugging me. It didn't want to create the data in the inventory file, and incorrectly and poorly wanted to put it in the app py file. The lab environment should probably have some guardrails to keep the AI on track of the lab instructions. With caveats explaining, it's "acting as an assistant following the lab too. while best practices are to fix XYZ, we can ignore it to continue with the lab." I'm confused why you wouldn't train the gemini model or RAG the model for these lab environments.

James G. · Reviewed 28 gün ago