Optimizing BigQuery for Cost and Performance v1.5 Reviews

565 K. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Kaiti L. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Vara L. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

APARNA G. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

SOMANABOINA INDIRA PRIYADARSHINI S. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

594-DEVIKA J. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

594-DEVIKA J. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Helene P. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

653-MALEKA S. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Uxía C. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Ayush G. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

The example query used for showing different between denorm vs norm structure. The normalized query never performed worse than the denormalized version, it even had less slot time and bytes shuffles when I ran it multiple times. (made sure that I don't have cache enabled) Either the example needs more data or it needs to be replaced with an updated one.

Nikhil S. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Salman K. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Ahmed B. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Daniele R. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

SHIVAPALLI N. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Azam M. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

MANUEL A. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

5D4 Shivananda B. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

5F7 _kashireddy navitha K. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

5A8-MORAM REDDY KUMAR R. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

634 Shravya r. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

Jordan B. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago

It would have been nice to see the denormalized table have array and struct fields and populated directly from the star schema tables.

Ken O. · Reviewed almost 3 years ago