Optimizing BigQuery for Cost and Performance v1.5 Reviews

6644 Rekam h. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Srija V. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

GANGARAM P. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

66G5 pateel shreshta r. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Harshad V. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Aidan L. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

okk

Edi N. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

The bq load command provided to create the county table was truncated. As a result this whole lab was useless and unrunnable.

Brendan C. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

great

7C8-yogeshwari C. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

great

7H0_NIHARIKA_ C. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Adriana B. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

V.GIRIDHAR . · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

good

6630- M. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Awesome

7E0_SHRIYA _. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Isam M. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Maulana R. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Karishma S. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

There was and extra "ORDER BY county" phrase in the given denormalized query, so the normalized query actually ran faster than denormalized query

Kevin Koshy V. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Shehreyar K. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Ondrej M. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Marco F. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Alireza E. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

IRS Data ist always to complicated for non-user users..shops would be much more accesible

Michael R. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Andrew C. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago

Aishwarya R. · Reviewed neredeyse 4 yıl ago