Optimizing BigQuery for Cost and Performance v1.5 Reviews

Vara L. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

APARNA G. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

SOMANABOINA INDIRA PRIYADARSHINI S. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

594-DEVIKA J. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

594-DEVIKA J. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Helene P. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

653-MALEKA S. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Uxía C. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Ayush G. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

The example query used for showing different between denorm vs norm structure. The normalized query never performed worse than the denormalized version, it even had less slot time and bytes shuffles when I ran it multiple times. (made sure that I don't have cache enabled) Either the example needs more data or it needs to be replaced with an updated one.

Nikhil S. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Salman K. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Ahmed B. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Daniele R. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

SHIVAPALLI N. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Azam M. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

MANUEL A. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

5D4 Shivananda B. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

5F7 _kashireddy navitha K. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

5A8-MORAM REDDY KUMAR R. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

634 Shravya r. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

Jordan B. · Reviewed neredeyse 3 yıl ago

It would have been nice to see the denormalized table have array and struct fields and populated directly from the star schema tables.

Ken O. · Reviewed yaklaşık 3 yıl ago

PATHEDI M. · Reviewed yaklaşık 3 yıl ago

Minal V. · Reviewed yaklaşık 3 yıl ago