Como otimizar o BigQuery para custo e desempenho v1.5 avaliações

Vara L. · Revisado há almost 3 years

APARNA G. · Revisado há almost 3 years

SOMANABOINA INDIRA PRIYADARSHINI S. · Revisado há almost 3 years

594-DEVIKA J. · Revisado há almost 3 years

594-DEVIKA J. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Helene P. · Revisado há almost 3 years

653-MALEKA S. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Uxía C. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Ayush G. · Revisado há almost 3 years

The example query used for showing different between denorm vs norm structure. The normalized query never performed worse than the denormalized version, it even had less slot time and bytes shuffles when I ran it multiple times. (made sure that I don't have cache enabled) Either the example needs more data or it needs to be replaced with an updated one.

Nikhil S. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Salman K. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Ahmed B. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Daniele R. · Revisado há almost 3 years

SHIVAPALLI N. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Azam M. · Revisado há almost 3 years

MANUEL A. · Revisado há almost 3 years

5D4 Shivananda B. · Revisado há almost 3 years

5F7 _kashireddy navitha K. · Revisado há almost 3 years

5A8-MORAM REDDY KUMAR R. · Revisado há almost 3 years

634 Shravya r. · Revisado há almost 3 years

Jordan B. · Revisado há almost 3 years

It would have been nice to see the denormalized table have array and struct fields and populated directly from the star schema tables.

Ken O. · Revisado há about 3 years

PATHEDI M. · Revisado há about 3 years

Minal V. · Revisado há about 3 years