关于“Partitioned Tables in Google BigQuery”的评价

Ibrahim A. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Nissie H. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Anubhav R. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Anubhav R. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Felipe T. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Sudhanshu S. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Ahmer A. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Ahmer A. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Kanako T. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Juan M. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Pamela R. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Aldo Rovani d. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

brenda n. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Nicolas T. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Itamar N. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Parveen Kumar R. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Oluwaseun O. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Rafael P. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Michael B. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Lisa P. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Okan S. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Yuka K. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Aleksandra O. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

For the second exercise, they should have demonstrated how the partitioned data used less processing power to query by date. AND, I am not sure why querying across all those partitions (to determine expiration time) doesn't take a lot of processing power - it has to query across every partition. It'd be good to explain that.

Heinz W. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核

Mohamed Amine T. · 已于 almost 2 years前审核