Agent Platform：使用 AutoML 預測貸款風險 Reviews

I thought previous lab was bad. This is way worse, If I could I would give this one minus stars... Why on earth make training pipeline to not use it later and load pre-trained model. "Demonstration only" in a lab is just ridiculus. Just make another video instead of lab in such case.. Well, I waited over an hour for pipeline to give some result. But nothing happened, training just went on and on.. for such trivial task! Simple boosting + xval would give results in less than 10 minutes. It just proves to me your AutoML is very bad, not worth using, waste of time and money. I am very disappointed.

Daniel K. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Luz A. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

The AutoML training failed the first time and took almost 2 and a half hours the second time.

Jean F. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Tejaswi K. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Luz A. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Raymundo G. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Adrian L. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Dincy A. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Ravindra P. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Abdallah K. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Prashanta d. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

GANTA S. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Shame training time of the model is so long

Andre K. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

悠人 西. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Ok

Rajesh P. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Vikas R. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Model did not complete in an hour as said for budget

Justine V. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Arunchandran S. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Manikandan V. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

dataset creations took long time

Md Mushfiqul A. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Manikandan M. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Ravi Kiran Y. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Palli S. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

Mo'ath Hussein Jamal H. · Reviewed over 1 year ago

should be created with more clear guideline especially including (Why + Other options)

Ehsan U. · Reviewed over 1 year ago