Configuring IAM Permissions with gcloud avis

Too many steps

Prabhakar K. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Filip B. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Jocelyne H. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Tiziano A. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Elena M. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Elena M. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Zala N. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Ronald L. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

tsz lam c. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

This lab needs to be reworked

Metitiri . · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

this one is little lengthy and cumbersome

Vlad C. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Cheuk Kwan C. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Amir K. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Praveen K. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Emma D. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Guillermo M. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Ibrahim M. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Anisa R. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Ashwini V. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

信錡 林. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

* lots of material, not bad in itself * consider "gcloud auth list" to show active account while switching * perhaps mention somewhere that permissions work cumulatively down the resource hierarchy - project is coarse-grained approach - permissions cannot be subtracted at subordinate level * serious quality issues (instructions): - quest says 1h, but actually 1:30h (good) - "curl ... | bash" is well-known security anti-pattern - please do not require editing of .bashrc for progress checking - quiz #4: required are "project id" and "IDENTITY" (which could be account ... or Google group, etc.) - in progress check, change wording to "granted roles/viewer to username2 in project2" (since there is no "restricting" when starting from nothing) - in progress check, change wording to "[...] name lab-2 in project-2" (from "Create an instance with name as lab-2 in Project 1") - sidebar: "Notice that the email address contains the SERVICE ACCOUNT name and the project id." (instead of role name, which is different technical term in context) - numerous typos, e.g. "utilites" or "orgnization", spurious "<" in Identities enumeration - various grammatical flaws, e.g. "for only to", "attach [...] onto"

John H. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

信錡 林. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

You-Ting K. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Cristian Danilo R. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans

Aditya F. · Examiné il y a plus de 5 ans