Creating Permanent Tables and Access-Controlled Views in BigQuery Reviews
23351 reviews
Sukanya R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Si J. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
test
Wilson Hooi Kuok L. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
useful hints like String_Agg function and Expiration titimestamp options
Muhammed Enes K. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Jun Liang Y. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Kelly C. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Chang Boon H. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Haziq Mudzakir . · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Sukanya R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Jose F. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Hon Hoe Dominic W. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Umesh P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Wendi K. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Thank You
Ahmed E. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
in some task there are additional conditions, f.ex. for a date, and in the view, there are no conditions for the date. When I added the condition for a date,the view was no validated by the checked point
Małgorzata Ś. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
I could not understand why the table all_sessions_raw_(1) was mentioned in this lab. ------------------ Browse your ecommerce dataset panel to confirm the all_sessions_raw_(1) is present. Why is the full table name not showing? Answer: The table suffix 20170801 is automatically partitioned by day. If we created more tables for other days, the all_sessions_raw_(N) would increment by N distinct days of data. There is another lab that explores different ways of partitioning your data tables. ------------------------ The answer to "Query 2: Columns revisited" seems incorrect: Question: What is wrong with the previous query which lists products? Answer: Rule #2 the query statement names are ignored My understanding is: the correct answer is not in any of the four options. The error clearly tells that select * should not be used when the columns are specified: Error: The number of columns in the column definition list does not match the number of columns produced by the query at [5:1]
Ajay K. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Tatiana V. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Marcel S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Mayra Elizabeth G. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Serhii K. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Y G H. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Nakul S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
1h30 would be better
Thierry L. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Surivi J. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Samiksha N. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.