Virtual Networking Reviews

Nobuhiro T. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Vinit F. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Yusuke N. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Ayaka Y. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Joe A. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Anatoly B. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Ben P. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Kevin W. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

On the expand the subnet part a mask 23 should be used, not a mask 24 (mask 24 it won't allow 500 VMs) The delete procedure is incorrect, while the VM instances need to be deleted before we can delete the network, the firewall rules don't. Firewall rules are deleted with the network and don't need to be deleted before as stated - this might lead to a wrong exam answer actually!

Marco A. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Yasuyuki Y. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Fast, too little time for learning, but very interesting.

Henning K. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Very easy to follow

Magnus H. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Martin M. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Some more examples on "Let's do that because, imagine we have..." So you can apply all to a real situation

Sergio F. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

The best lab till now

Gopalakrishnan A. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Rajesh S. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

traceroute was not available in my SSH session

Wayne H. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Alejandro R. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Jeff M. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

While expanding the ip addresses in the subnet to accommodate 500 VMs, the subnet mask should be 255.255.254.0 or xxx.xxx.xxx.0/23. But in the lab, its mentioned as xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24.

Uday P. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Joshua L. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Sivakumar A. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Victor T. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

Nicolas K. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago

DOntae T. · Reviewed almost 9 years ago