Machine Learning with TensorFlow and Vertex AI Reviews
14128 reviews
Sary H. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Explanation is not quite clear. Difficult to follow
Thawatchai R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
kamal o. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Radwa S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Molk S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Samarth A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Salma S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Saheed A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Hasnaa M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Great
Vikram A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Its is not designed and explained
Vikram A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Update this lab or retire it! Everything seems obsolete (python 3.5, TF 1.14, ...). More time as well. Installations & updates etc... take almost 10 minutes, and the SSH is very slow. The instructions are also very difficult to follow.
Matthew J. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Victor M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Jad Z. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
David M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Lee Y. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Jad Z. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
more time to investigate the code would be nice
Dominik L. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Very Tough one
Owais A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Andrew M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
In Create minimal training and test datasets, repeated instruction and code chunk could be removed: Create the training data... rm full.csv` In Create a TensorFlow experimental framework in Python, the training model didn't execute correctly since my output was different from the expected: INFO:tensorflow:Saving dict for global step 200: accuracy = 0.89453167, accuracy_baseline = 0.72878134, auc = 0.88293874, auc_precision_recall = 0.946697, average_loss = 0.5809859, global_step = 200, label/mean = 0.72878134, loss = 290.5801, precision = 0.90075845, prediction/mean = 0.7678837, recall = 0.9611797, rmse = 0.3024143 To be: tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.InvalidArgumentError: assertion failed: [string_input_producer requires a non-null input tensor] [[{{node input_producer/Assert/Assert}}]] However, the job appears to execute seamlessly and with lots of Warning (148) and Error (32).
Moria W. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Trivikram M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Sunit M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
Ran out of time on the first try. Had to do it again, but even then, needed to blaze through it to get it all done in time. IMO, this lab would be better if it allowed for an hour and a half or even 2 hours, to give time to really understand the code and what is happening
Joe R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
rozan w. · Reviewed over 4 years ago
We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.