关于“Caching Static Files with Amazon CloudFront”的评价

Jeroen S. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Kai T. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Mohammad N. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Robert K. · 评论almost 11 years之前

James M. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Charles Z. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Yasser Q. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Curt C. · 评论almost 11 years之前

chris f. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Marie Y. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Pat N. · 评论almost 11 years之前

It seems the caching mechanism of CloudFront may have changed significantly. When deleting the cf_lab1.html file the changes were immediately reflected on both the S3 URL and the CloudFront URL. When replacing the missing file cf_lab1.html with the ...highlands.html file again the change was immediately apparent. I'm left with the idea that the exercise in invalidating the cf_lab1.html file was a waste of time. Perhaps the caching is still in effect and it was somehow updating much faster than the expected 24 hours and invalidating deprecated files is still necessary? I have no idea. This is confusing. The first half of the lab was useful in learning the steps to link an S3 bucket to CloudFront.

Ross W. · 评论almost 11 years之前

the lab was a bit slow and the txt file did not have the test html commands.

Randy K. · 评论almost 11 years之前

yingwei d. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Binwu H. · 评论almost 11 years之前

David P. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Yuji W. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Sam E. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Chiru M. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Ahmed B. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Nice!

Vladimir S. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Phillip D. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Daniel D. · 评论almost 11 years之前

Kent S. · 评论almost 11 years之前