关于“Caching Static Files with Amazon CloudFront”的评价

评论

Praveen P. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Scott M. · 评论almost 10 years之前

It is missing setting metadata "max-age=XX". Doing so for files in S3 makes the exercise a lot more clear.

Enrico R. · 评论almost 10 years之前

great material

Ozgur C. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Robi Lexeme C. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Pascal B. · 评论almost 10 years之前

took forever to deploy CloudFront...

Mark B. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Juan C. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Ithamar D. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Jeferson E. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Kaushik M. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Wade M. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Rubén R. · 评论almost 10 years之前

西川 拓. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Parts didn't work

Michael R. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Behavior described in lab for caching does not match reality. the CloudFront URL simply redirects to the S3 bucket URL so it's not possible to test the caching as described in the lab.

Corin F. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Good but i would to use the Origin Access Identity (OAI) in the Lab too

Saul F. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Philip T. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Marc P. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Too simple and can show us more options to work with.

ARUN REDDY M. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Sangeetha V. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Al G. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Jason N. · 评论almost 10 years之前

Giljae O. · 评论almost 10 years之前

我们无法确保发布的评价来自已购买或已使用产品的消费者。评价未经 Google 核实。