关于“Caching Static Files with Amazon CloudFront”的评价
评论
Praveen P. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Scott M. · 评论almost 10 years之前
It is missing setting metadata "max-age=XX". Doing so for files in S3 makes the exercise a lot more clear.
Enrico R. · 评论almost 10 years之前
great material
Ozgur C. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Robi Lexeme C. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Pascal B. · 评论almost 10 years之前
took forever to deploy CloudFront...
Mark B. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Juan C. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Ithamar D. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Jeferson E. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Kaushik M. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Wade M. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Rubén R. · 评论almost 10 years之前
西川 拓. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Parts didn't work
Michael R. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Behavior described in lab for caching does not match reality. the CloudFront URL simply redirects to the S3 bucket URL so it's not possible to test the caching as described in the lab.
Corin F. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Good but i would to use the Origin Access Identity (OAI) in the Lab too
Saul F. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Philip T. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Marc P. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Too simple and can show us more options to work with.
ARUN REDDY M. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Sangeetha V. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Al G. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Jason N. · 评论almost 10 years之前
Giljae O. · 评论almost 10 years之前
我们无法确保发布的评价来自已购买或已使用产品的消费者。评价未经 Google 核实。