关于“优化 LookML 查询的性能”的评价
24826 条评价
Venkata S. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
SMRITI G. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
KANDI A. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Ishav V. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Sherilyn P. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Emiliano A. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
María Del Mar D. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Jaume A. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
V S. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
done
Vani M. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Yaxiong W. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
María Del Mar D. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Marie-Christine C. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Multiple notes, in order: - 1 hour and 30 minutes is NOT enough to do this lab properly and read through things and extra resources being listed within the lab. At least another 30 minutes would be required. - In the section "Implement caching policies", you are describing an extract, load, transform process but then you summarize that as "ETL" instead of "ELT". - In the section "Join the minimal amount of views to define new Explores", you state that the one_to_many configuration may not be the "most optimal configuration" when in fact this is not about optimal, using one_to_many here is just incorrect. - In the section "Define performant join relationships for efficient Explore queries", you provide the instruction - "Return to the browser tab for the Explore query, and refresh the page." and then speak about there being 2 queries, which I understand, but when you ask folks to refresh the page the explore runs automatically and if you are not quick enough you won't see the query that generates the table because you will already have run the updated configuration. Either find a different way to do this (like opening through a new tab) or provide a workaround for folks to see the 2 queries. - In the section "Modify and review PDTs in development", the question "Why is aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales still not listed under the Production tab, even though it was built successfully?" doesn't make sense. "aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales" IS listed within the Production tab as its previous version that was run, it didn't go anywhere, it is just also listed in the Development tab because of the changes we implemented in Development. - The section 4 is missing a completion check as if it isn't even part of this lab. - In the section "Ready for more?", and this I think applies to all labs I took so far, please suggest the next step in the learning path or at least don't suggest something general/unspecific/unrelated to the current lab being done.
Tiago R. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
素 李. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Ajit P. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Gopi J. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Martyna K. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Good
Gitesh G. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Dr. Kondala Kameswara Rao N. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
537 Chinni krishna M. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Saurav K. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
YOGENDER S. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Kishan P. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
Raji n. · 已于 about 3 years前审核
我们无法确保发布的评价来自已购买或已使用产品的消费者。评价未经 Google 核实。