Optimizing Performance of LookML Queries Reviews

24826 reviews

Venkata S. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

SMRITI G. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

KANDI A. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Ishav V. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Sherilyn P. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Emiliano A. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

María Del Mar D. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Jaume A. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

V S. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

done

Vani M. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Yaxiong W. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

María Del Mar D. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Marie-Christine C. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Multiple notes, in order: - 1 hour and 30 minutes is NOT enough to do this lab properly and read through things and extra resources being listed within the lab. At least another 30 minutes would be required. - In the section "Implement caching policies", you are describing an extract, load, transform process but then you summarize that as "ETL" instead of "ELT". - In the section "Join the minimal amount of views to define new Explores", you state that the one_to_many configuration may not be the "most optimal configuration" when in fact this is not about optimal, using one_to_many here is just incorrect. - In the section "Define performant join relationships for efficient Explore queries", you provide the instruction - "Return to the browser tab for the Explore query, and refresh the page." and then speak about there being 2 queries, which I understand, but when you ask folks to refresh the page the explore runs automatically and if you are not quick enough you won't see the query that generates the table because you will already have run the updated configuration. Either find a different way to do this (like opening through a new tab) or provide a workaround for folks to see the 2 queries. - In the section "Modify and review PDTs in development", the question "Why is aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales still not listed under the Production tab, even though it was built successfully?" doesn't make sense. "aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales" IS listed within the Production tab as its previous version that was run, it didn't go anywhere, it is just also listed in the Development tab because of the changes we implemented in Development. - The section 4 is missing a completion check as if it isn't even part of this lab. - In the section "Ready for more?", and this I think applies to all labs I took so far, please suggest the next step in the learning path or at least don't suggest something general/unspecific/unrelated to the current lab being done.

Tiago R. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

素 李. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Ajit P. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Gopi J. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Martyna K. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Good

Gitesh G. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Dr. Kondala Kameswara Rao N. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

537 Chinni krishna M. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Saurav K. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

YOGENDER S. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Kishan P. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

Raji n. · Reviewed около 3 лет ago

We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.