Opinie (Optimizing Performance of LookML Queries)

María Del Mar D. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Jaume A. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

V S. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

done

Vani M. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Yaxiong W. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

María Del Mar D. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Marie-Christine C. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Multiple notes, in order: - 1 hour and 30 minutes is NOT enough to do this lab properly and read through things and extra resources being listed within the lab. At least another 30 minutes would be required. - In the section "Implement caching policies", you are describing an extract, load, transform process but then you summarize that as "ETL" instead of "ELT". - In the section "Join the minimal amount of views to define new Explores", you state that the one_to_many configuration may not be the "most optimal configuration" when in fact this is not about optimal, using one_to_many here is just incorrect. - In the section "Define performant join relationships for efficient Explore queries", you provide the instruction - "Return to the browser tab for the Explore query, and refresh the page." and then speak about there being 2 queries, which I understand, but when you ask folks to refresh the page the explore runs automatically and if you are not quick enough you won't see the query that generates the table because you will already have run the updated configuration. Either find a different way to do this (like opening through a new tab) or provide a workaround for folks to see the 2 queries. - In the section "Modify and review PDTs in development", the question "Why is aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales still not listed under the Production tab, even though it was built successfully?" doesn't make sense. "aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales" IS listed within the Production tab as its previous version that was run, it didn't go anywhere, it is just also listed in the Development tab because of the changes we implemented in Development. - The section 4 is missing a completion check as if it isn't even part of this lab. - In the section "Ready for more?", and this I think applies to all labs I took so far, please suggest the next step in the learning path or at least don't suggest something general/unspecific/unrelated to the current lab being done.

Tiago R. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

素 李. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Ajit P. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Gopi J. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Martyna K. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Good

Gitesh G. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Dr. Kondala Kameswara Rao N. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

537 Chinni krishna M. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Saurav K. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

YOGENDER S. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Kishan P. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Raji n. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

good

Bhumika H. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Puneeth Kumar O. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

VASA Y. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Naga sai R. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Mylena B. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu

Laxmidhar S. · Sprawdzono ponad 3 lata temu