Optimiser les performances des requêtes LookML avis

María Del Mar D. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Jaume A. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

V S. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

done

Vani M. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Yaxiong W. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

María Del Mar D. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Marie-Christine C. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Multiple notes, in order: - 1 hour and 30 minutes is NOT enough to do this lab properly and read through things and extra resources being listed within the lab. At least another 30 minutes would be required. - In the section "Implement caching policies", you are describing an extract, load, transform process but then you summarize that as "ETL" instead of "ELT". - In the section "Join the minimal amount of views to define new Explores", you state that the one_to_many configuration may not be the "most optimal configuration" when in fact this is not about optimal, using one_to_many here is just incorrect. - In the section "Define performant join relationships for efficient Explore queries", you provide the instruction - "Return to the browser tab for the Explore query, and refresh the page." and then speak about there being 2 queries, which I understand, but when you ask folks to refresh the page the explore runs automatically and if you are not quick enough you won't see the query that generates the table because you will already have run the updated configuration. Either find a different way to do this (like opening through a new tab) or provide a workaround for folks to see the 2 queries. - In the section "Modify and review PDTs in development", the question "Why is aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales still not listed under the Production tab, even though it was built successfully?" doesn't make sense. "aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales" IS listed within the Production tab as its previous version that was run, it didn't go anywhere, it is just also listed in the Development tab because of the changes we implemented in Development. - The section 4 is missing a completion check as if it isn't even part of this lab. - In the section "Ready for more?", and this I think applies to all labs I took so far, please suggest the next step in the learning path or at least don't suggest something general/unspecific/unrelated to the current lab being done.

Tiago R. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

素 李. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Ajit P. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Gopi J. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Martyna K. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Good

Gitesh G. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Dr. Kondala Kameswara Rao N. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

537 Chinni krishna M. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Saurav K. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

YOGENDER S. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Kishan P. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Raji n. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

good

Bhumika H. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Puneeth Kumar O. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

VASA Y. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Naga sai R. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Mylena B. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans

Laxmidhar S. · Examiné il y a plus de 3 ans