Optimizing Performance of LookML Queries Reviews

María Del Mar D. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Jaume A. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

V S. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

done

Vani M. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Yaxiong W. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

María Del Mar D. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Marie-Christine C. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Multiple notes, in order: - 1 hour and 30 minutes is NOT enough to do this lab properly and read through things and extra resources being listed within the lab. At least another 30 minutes would be required. - In the section "Implement caching policies", you are describing an extract, load, transform process but then you summarize that as "ETL" instead of "ELT". - In the section "Join the minimal amount of views to define new Explores", you state that the one_to_many configuration may not be the "most optimal configuration" when in fact this is not about optimal, using one_to_many here is just incorrect. - In the section "Define performant join relationships for efficient Explore queries", you provide the instruction - "Return to the browser tab for the Explore query, and refresh the page." and then speak about there being 2 queries, which I understand, but when you ask folks to refresh the page the explore runs automatically and if you are not quick enough you won't see the query that generates the table because you will already have run the updated configuration. Either find a different way to do this (like opening through a new tab) or provide a workaround for folks to see the 2 queries. - In the section "Modify and review PDTs in development", the question "Why is aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales still not listed under the Production tab, even though it was built successfully?" doesn't make sense. "aggregated_orders::aggregate_sales" IS listed within the Production tab as its previous version that was run, it didn't go anywhere, it is just also listed in the Development tab because of the changes we implemented in Development. - The section 4 is missing a completion check as if it isn't even part of this lab. - In the section "Ready for more?", and this I think applies to all labs I took so far, please suggest the next step in the learning path or at least don't suggest something general/unspecific/unrelated to the current lab being done.

Tiago R. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

素 李. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Ajit P. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Gopi J. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Martyna K. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Good

Gitesh G. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Dr. Kondala Kameswara Rao N. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

537 Chinni krishna M. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Saurav K. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

YOGENDER S. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Kishan P. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Raji n. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

good

Bhumika H. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Puneeth Kumar O. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

VASA Y. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Naga sai R. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Mylena B. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago

Laxmidhar S. · Reviewed أكثر من 3 سنوات ago