Esecuzione del feature engineering avanzato in Keras recensioni
10397 recensioni
Pvrmallikharjuna rao P. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Juliana B. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Francesco N. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Nikita K. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
What happened to the processed timestamp feature?
Marcus W. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Manfred S. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Shubham K. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Murilo A. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Chan S. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
kazokada k. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Oskar F. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Iago A. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
John K. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Eric T. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Good!
Alex C. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
1. The provided csv does not match the expected column order in the notebook. It ends up reading passenger_count as if it was pickup_datetime, giving dates such as "1" and "5" -- which are not parseable as dates 2. The lab asks the student to parse pickup datetime to add it as a feature column, but ultimately that is not possible due to the input data -- the parsed picks the wrong column as pickup_datetime, and the csv does not have a pickup_datetime column which could be parsed as a result, the student will waste time trying to parse invalid columns and probably won't be able to get to the point where they would get to use such columns for training. The lab solution currently present in git (2021-04-06) gets around this problem by not using the pickup_datetime column at all -- it just defines functions to parse datetime, then drops pickup_datetime from the input. The proposed model ends up using a temporal feature completely by accident: it uses passenger_count as a feature -- but on the csv, the column taken as passenger_count is actually hourofday, already present in the dataset. As a result, the model inputs are incorrectly named, and predicting with passenger_count=5 is actually taking into account the predicted price for a ride at 5am
Rodrigo K. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Samuel Angel R. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Manu M. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Lu Y. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Kevin D. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Christian C. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
akhil s. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Rahul D. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Domenico S. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Merin S. · Recensione inserita quasi 5 anni fa
Non garantiamo che le recensioni pubblicate provengano da consumatori che hanno acquistato o utilizzato i prodotti. Le recensioni non sono verificate da Google.