关于“Using the Natural Language API to classify unstructured text”的评价

René J. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Mario A. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Jesus A. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Lam M. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Pradeep T. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

teerarat n. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Gabriele B. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Agus S. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Kuramochi M. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Jachym S. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Ishfaq A. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Jarupong T. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Wieke A. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

If I create the table with other name and change the table name in all scripts, all things work well.

Vu L. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Phuc N. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Krian Bayu A. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Hoa P. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Nurul F. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Hai L. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Wee Hong S. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Thanh D. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Erwin B. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Gabriel M. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

Todo bien

Roberto P. · 已于 over 2 years前审核

This is one of the only labs I've seen that includes a section encouraging you to explore the capabilities of BigQuery, but a longer lab duration and a more complex dataset would have made that way more valuable. Focusing on more than one category per article would have also been more interesting. We should make use of the "Preview" feature in BigQuery, after running the Python file during Task 6, as it is presented by Google as a usually better choice than SELECT * queries. More customization and user-experimentation would make the lab more engaging, maybe we could have an incomplete version of the Python file to start with, or even try to write it from scratch ourselves with some hints (and perhaps compare our work to the pre-existing file after, or use it if ours doesn't work). The commands to create and appropriately permission a service account could use some more detailed explanation.

Nicholas C. · 已于 over 2 years前审核