关于“使用 LookML 建立衍生資料表”的评价

YASA A. · 评论over 2 years之前

Rondla M. · 评论over 2 years之前

663-YASWANTH SAI V. · 评论over 2 years之前

Victoria P. · 评论over 2 years之前

5E6- S. · 评论over 2 years之前

David W. · 评论over 2 years之前

Сергей П. · 评论over 2 years之前

577 m. · 评论over 2 years之前

522 VAMSHI KRISHNA G. · 评论over 2 years之前

Akshith Reddy G. · 评论over 2 years之前

Soumya G. · 评论over 2 years之前

Bagus P. · 评论over 2 years之前

Persisted both derived tables. The lab instructions are flawed since the database trigger parameter only returns no LookML warnings on the order_details_summary (ndt), but the lab says to use the order_details (sdt) to verify the explore no longer uses an ephemeral CTE. I used persist_for and made order_details refresh or regenerate every 1 hour. That will cause the table to drop after 1 hour and until a user runs an explore against it. Maybe it was a test since there was some discussion of best practice in that regard.

Eric B. · 评论over 2 years之前

SAVALI H. · 评论over 2 years之前

P SAI K. · 评论over 2 years之前

650 P. · 评论over 2 years之前

Carol M. · 评论over 2 years之前

Ajay Kumar P. · 评论over 2 years之前

1244_ P. · 评论over 2 years之前

MAHESH M. · 评论over 2 years之前

Md Tauseef K. · 评论over 2 years之前

5R6 V. · 评论over 2 years之前

Arastu D. · 评论over 2 years之前

Nicolas f. · 评论over 2 years之前

Venkata M. · 评论over 2 years之前