Creating Derived Tables Using LookML Reviews

Sandeep Kumar Raju S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Wee Ngee A. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Sơn N. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Thoa L. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Quang N. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Kruthi V. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Lê Quốc H. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Hoài T. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Quỳnh Như P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Shivam S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Marcel R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Shivam S. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Zheng Hou L. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Pendar T. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

ye

Tuấn T. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Eric R. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

yap y. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Naina C. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Jie Han L. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

LAU PEI TONG /. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Kenneth O. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

The last section on Persistent derived tables made no sense. I still see the WITH statement there when the lab instructions say it shouldn't be there. The screenshot used by lab to prove that it worked also shows a WITH inside, and looks exactly the a previous screenshot in the lab with WITH. I was expecting no WITH in the sql at all

Pro M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

the last part is confusing. I don't see the difference?

Chenyze M. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Vo N. · Reviewed over 4 years ago

Tan P. · Reviewed over 4 years ago