Creating Derived Tables Using LookML Reviews
23717 reviews
5E6- S. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
David W. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Сергей П. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
577 m. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
522 VAMSHI KRISHNA G. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Akshith Reddy G. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Soumya G. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Bagus P. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Persisted both derived tables. The lab instructions are flawed since the database trigger parameter only returns no LookML warnings on the order_details_summary (ndt), but the lab says to use the order_details (sdt) to verify the explore no longer uses an ephemeral CTE. I used persist_for and made order_details refresh or regenerate every 1 hour. That will cause the table to drop after 1 hour and until a user runs an explore against it. Maybe it was a test since there was some discussion of best practice in that regard.
Eric B. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
SAVALI H. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
P SAI K. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
650 P. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Carol M. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Ajay Kumar P. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
1244_ P. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
MAHESH M. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Md Tauseef K. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
5R6 V. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Arastu D. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Nicolas f. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Venkata M. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Ramagiri A. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
Joshua A. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
The query for the persistent data table and the non persistent one are the same
Ulises M. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
MOHAMMAD A. · Reviewed about 3 years ago
We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.