Creating Derived Tables Using LookML Reviews
23658 reviews
Juan Carlos S. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
맛있어 사. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
인철 조. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
영찬 김. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Chuthamat B. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Prashanth B. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
lookerML has a lot of error especially finding view directions!
문 종. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Raunak K. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Adarsh P. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Eugene Minwhoan K. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Olha S. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Volodymyr A. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Pawan S. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
GUNDA SHIVA KUMAR G. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
ADITYA R. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
만추 육. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
matthew G. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Peter K. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Shanmugaraj S. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Yashika G. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Prashanth B. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
Ivan P. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
ถิรวัฒน์ พ. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
ok
SHAIK MAHABOOB P. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
the screenshot in task 4 showing sql after persisting the native derived table is the same as the sql in task 3, I think the reason is in task 4 in explore order_items the view order_details is used instead of order_details_summary, where the datagroup_trigger parameter is added, however if I use the view of ndt, there is a warning in line 6 of the view definition, though execution completed successfully, and the sql shows the persistent derived table instead of the with statement
Mingjie C. · Reviewed ما يقرب من سنتين ago
We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.